⭐ This is top shelf.
House Specials showcases our boldest takes and biggest wins, diving deep into consumer rights and featuring guest pours from fellow champions of consumer advocacy. Come thirsty and ready to explore!
Big Changes Coming to Bankruptcy Rule 3002.1
What Homeowners and Practitioners Need to Know by December 2025
Effective Date: December 1, 2025
Applies To: All Chapter 13 cases involving mortgage or other debts secured by a debtor’s principal residence
The Short Version
10/24/25 - If you’re in a Chapter 13 plan and making payments on your home loan, Rule 3002.1 is the rule that keeps your mortgage servicer honest. It forces lenders to disclose changes in payments, fees, or escrow so that, by the end of your case, you’re truly current on your mortgage.
But starting December 1, 2025, that rule is getting a significant makeover. The revisions broaden its reach, change the wording that determines which loans are covered, and tighten how notices and responses must be handled.
For homeowners and bankruptcy professionals alike, this is the most important mortgage-related bankruptcy change in a decade.
A Quick Refresher: What Rule 3002.1 Does Now
Currently, Rule 3002.1 applies in a Chapter 13 case “if the plan provides that the trustee or the debtor will make contractual installment payments” on a mortgage for the debtor’s principal residence.
In plain English:
- The rule kicks in when someone (debtor or trustee) is paying the regular mortgage payment through or under the plan.
- The servicer must file official notices for:
- Payment-change notices (when escrow or interest adjustments occur);
- Post-petition fees, expenses, or charges (such as inspection or late fees); and
- Final cure responses (at plan completion, confirming whether the loan is current).
Failure to file these notices can lead to sanctions, including disallowance of the fees or even the debtor’s recovery of attorney’s fees for enforcing compliance.
What’s Changing on December 1, 2025
The new amendments overhaul both the scope and the procedural details of Rule 3002.1. Here’s the key language shift and why it matters:
1. Expanded Scope – From “Contractual Installment Payments” to “Payments on the Debt”
The amended rule applies “when the trustee or the debtor will make payments on the debt secured by the debtor’s principal residence”—not just contractual installment payments.
✅ Why this matters:
This change closes a loophole. Servicers sometimes argued the rule didn’t apply if the debtor cured arrears but wasn’t paying the ongoing monthly mortgage through the plan. Now, even cure-and-maintain plans, lump-sum payments, or partial arrangements are clearly covered.
In short: If the debt is secured by the home and being paid under the plan, the rule applies.
What’s Changing on December 1, 2025
2. Clarified Notice Requirements and Updated Forms
- The Official Forms (especially Form 410S1, 410S2, and the final-cure response form) are being revised to align with the rule’s new text.
- The updates emphasize timing, completeness, and service requirements.
- Servicers must now use the latest forms exactly as prescribed—courts are tightening tolerance for “close enough.”
✅ Practical effect: Better standardization and fewer “technical” fights over whether a servicer’s notice was valid.
3. New Motion Practice for Disputes
When a debtor or trustee disagrees with a notice (for example, claiming an escrow change is wrong or a fee isn’t allowed), the amended rule clarifies that the issue must be raised by motion.
- This ensures a consistent, formal process for resolving disputes about payment changes or fees.
- Judges will expect prompt action — typically within 21 days of receiving the notice.
✅ Tip for debtors’ counsel: Calendar every Rule 3002.1 notice and act fast if it’s wrong; silence could mean waiver.
What’s Changing on December 1, 2025
4. Enhanced Sanctions and Enforcement Clarity
The amended rule retains the court’s power to sanction noncompliance but gives more structure to how sanctions are assessed.
Courts are expected to look at:
- Prejudice to the debtor;
- Whether the servicer’s noncompliance was willful or repeated;
- Whether the debtor incurred costs fixing the error.
✅ Outcome: Expect courts to continue imposing fee-shifting and penalty orders where servicers ignore notice rules.
Why These Changes Matter to Homeowners
For debtors, the Rule 3002.1 framework is what ensures that by the time your CH13 is discharged, your mortgage is current. Without accurate, timely notices, you risk emerging from bankruptcy only to find surprise fees or arrears.
The expanded scope means:
- More loans covered. Even if you pay your mortgage directly, the servicer must still follow these notice rules when the plan affects that debt.
- More transparency. You and your attorney will receive notices whenever the payment changes or fees are added.
- Stronger accountability. Courts have clearer authority to penalize noncompliant lenders.
What Lawyers and Trustees Should Prepare for
- Update local forms and standing orders — some districts will revise model Chapter 13 plans to match the new rule
- Train staff to calendar payment-change notices and check the docket regularly.
- Coordinate with servicers early — confirm who files notices and how service is verified.
- Anticipate increased motion practice—especially in the first year as practitioners test the boundaries.
Looking Ahead
The 2025 amendment reflects a broader trend: greater consumer protection through transparency in mortgage servicing during bankruptcy.
For debtors, that means fewer post-discharge surprises. For servicers, it means higher compliance pressure—and more potential exposure if they miss a deadline. Bankruptcy judges have long been frustrated by servicers who quietly add fees or misapply payments. This rule change gives them sharper tools to make sure the “fresh start” truly starts fresh
Checklist: Are You Protected Under the New Rule 3002.1?
✅ My Chapter 13 plan includes my home mortgage or arrears.
✅ I receive every Notice of Payment Change and Post-Petition Fee Notice.
✅ I (or my attorney) review each one within 21 days.
✅ I will confirm the “Notice of Final Cure Payment” before discharge.
Bankruptcy and Buy Now, Pay Later
What Happens to Klarna, Affirm, and Afterpay Debt?
“Buy Now, Pay Later” (BNPL) services like Klarna, Affirm, and Afterpay have exploded in popularity. They promise instant approvals, interest-free payments,and a quick way to take home what you want without a credit card. But what happens if your financial situation takes a turn and you need to file for bankruptcy? Surprisingly, many consumers don’t realize that BNPL obligations are treated much like traditional unsecured debt—meaning they can potentially be discharged in bankruptcy, just like a credit card or personal loan.
What is Buy Now, Pay Later Debt?
BNPL apps let you split a purchase into smaller installments, usually without interest (as long as you pay on time). But behind the convenience, these transactions create a legal obligation to pay—often structured as a short-term loan. For Example: You buy a $600 laptop through Klarna in four payments of $150. Until those payments are complete, Klarna is your creditor.
Miss a payment? You may face late fees, credit reporting issues, and debt collection—just like with any other loan.
How BNPL Debt is Treated in Bankruptcy
When filing for bankruptcy, all debts must be listed, including Klarna, Affirm, and Afterpay. Here’s how they typically play out:
- Chapter 7 Bankruptcy (Liquidation): BNPL debts are considered unsecured debt (like credit cards). In most cases, they can be discharged, wiping out your obligation to pay.
- Chapter 13 Bankruptcy (Repayment Plan): BNPL debts are lumped in with other unsecured creditors. You may repay only a portion of what’s owed over 3–5 years, with the rest discharged at the end.
Importantly, the treatment doesn’t depend on whether the debt is “small” or “new.” Even if it’s a $100 BNPL purchase, it still must be disclosed.
Hidden Risks: Credit Reporting and Collection
BNPL companies are increasingly reporting to credit bureaus. That means missed payments may show up on your credit report, hurting your score before you even file for bankruptcy. Additionally:
- Some BNPL lenders sell unpaid accounts to debt collectors.
- Aggressive collection attempts may raise FDCPA (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) issues.
- Incorrect credit reporting could trigger FCRA (Fair Credit Reporting Act) claims.
So, filing bankruptcy may not only wipe out the debt but also stop harassment and correct credit errors tied to BNPL defaults.
Key Takeaway for Consumers
BNPL feels like a convenient alternative to credit cards, but in the eyes of the law, it’s still debt. If you’re considering bankruptcy, Klarna, Affirm, Afterpay, and similar obligations must be disclosed and are usually treated like other unsecured loans.
👉 The bottom line: You don’t lose bankruptcy protection just because your debt came through an app instead of a credit card company.
Yes, You Can Discharge Student Loans in Bankruptcy
Here’s What You Need to Know
07/18/25 - For decades, you may’ve heard that student loans are undischargeable in bankruptcy — wrong. Thanks to updated guidance from the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Education (DOE), discharging federal student loans is not only possible but becoming more attainable for borrowers facing true hardship.